The phenomena or trope we're looking at
here is hard, polystyrene plastic toy animals, manufactured in a hollow-cast
style, with the hollow in the extremities (legs mostly) visible, this due to or
caused by the act of not bothering with undercuts by creating the animal in two
halves - in a shallower, two part mould, and then gluing the halves together.
This is presumably cheaper that having a more complicated three-part mould, to
create a similar solid/single-piece model from polyethylene or PVC; with the
undercuts filled-in?
These two were shelfied by Brian Berke over
two years in new York and are branded to Lan
Jia Da (left) and Rong Xing Toys
(right), one of which (if not both!) has to be a phantom brand.
Contents are identical and scale is 'large'
but not consistent. The actual sculpts are quite good, the panda possibly a bit
dog-like and I'm not sure I'm familiar with the monkey species, but they are
dirt-cheap rack-toys!
Again a year-apart and again 'stateside,
but the same branding (Zhenkai), and
scale is further apart with the domestic cat posing a threat not just to the
zebra, but the giraffe! They are also manufactured slightly differently with
the hooves/ankles fully-round, so the possible savings hinted at above my not
have been involved here, which begs the question; why any hollows at all? I
guess material is still saved?
These are of a larger size again, and carry
AAI branding on the sticker and
tampo-printed onto the side of the Donkey. We've previously seen them here
shipping-in dinosaurs from the Far East sub-branded to Bely, also courtesy of
Brian - both the animals shelfie and the past dino' set. Design is the same as
the first set we looked at.
I love the artwork (Photoshop or I'm TJF),
one sheep is saying to the other "Don't
look now, but there's a giraffe in our field" while the horse clearly let Lady
Gaga do its hair!
Red Deer have gone with a giant duck and tiny horse! The left hand one was sent to
the blog by Peter Evans, over a year ago I think; although they are now on a
hook in Fleet here, as the new pound-shop has them (right hand image) where
they were shelfied! Added play value comes with two pieces of fence! And some
greenery . . .
. . . which are no more than sections of
budget plastic plant! It's naff isn't it; not even cost can be an excuse for
not including a couple of 'proper' flat trees!
A few close-ups showing how it's the backs
of the legs which end-up still hollow after the two separately-moulded pieces
have been glued together. This allows for the animal to be shot in a shallow
mould-tool, like a kit, before being assembled and given a touch of paint. The
duck and hen however seem to have a third 'gusset' piece, or to have be
manufactured slightly differently, possibly more expensively, but it's the unit
price of the set which matters.
I also had these come in (from Chris or
Jim?) in an odd-lot, the deer is missing his antlers and they have some age to
them, probably weren't 'rack toys' but are manufactured and assembled the same
way as the others. You can see they have been given fully-round legs but at the
cost of a flat section running up to them from the join-line.
These resemble Tri-Ang/Mettoys 'wheelimals' in size and execution, but without the
wheels and I suspect they may be Marx?
Whether US or UK I wouldn't like to guess, especially as there's no evidence
for them being Marx at all beyond a similarity between this Hippo's pose (and
painting) and the little HO Miniature Masterpiece
one?
I guess an infant's ark set? And that's
large hollow, polystyrene animals for while. Thanks to Brian, Peter, Chris and
Jim for the 'stuff' of the article.
Hello, this hippo looks like a copie of the French JRD composition hippo.
ReplyDeleteCheers Christope, it wouldn't surprise me, while some Americans are frightfully defensive of Marx, they do seem to have a history of plagiarism, especially from the/their Hong Kong suppliers!
ReplyDeleteH