I had totally forgotten I had these, I think the painted originals were in the 'big purchase' from Portsmouth, but the re-issues must have been one of those last Birmingham shows (2010/11) or a PW show of around the same time? This is reaching-with-dagger bloke; the reissue is a bit flashy, while the paint's survived well on the original. Running-forward chap has had an accident! Again the reissue is flashy and the original's paint means I will try to save him, but I know from past experience - trying to fix these old chalky figures is often more trouble than it's worth. I actually photographed him first, then did both sides of all the others, so returned to him, them couldn't decide which was the better shot, so used both! Mr. casually-watching-the-manic-hysteria-of-the-other-three guy!
He's a really nice figure and only highlights the lack of a half-dozen other poses! Maybe they had two tools and one was damaged beyond repair before production commenced?
Because I'd forgotten I had these, I was today-years-old (actually yesterday!) when I learnt, or re-learnt that when they were re-issued, they produced a third legionnaire, an officer, from the chap obviously fighting-off the first Arab!And looking at the bases, they copied the clubbing guy, and gave the copy a heavier base, then re-cut the original tool cavity to produce the officer - who is on the old base?
Hugh, the sword arm was added to a spare mould by Giles Brown.
ReplyDeleteCheers Paul, I knew the answer would be in one of your [excellent] publications, but everythin's back in storage again! You can't help with the cameleer in the previous post?
ReplyDeleteH
JIM did that pose, but it might be a copy. I think the camel is by JIM.
ReplyDeleteThey're both the same rubber (like late Auburn or maybe Thomas spacemen) so they'll be JIM copies or JIM experiment . . . those French firms tried everything once! Cheers,
ReplyDeleteH