One reason for this will be the fact that Culpitt's (who will have handled the
bulk of them) seem to have only offered the three man 'stumps' vignette we
looked at last time, at some point - a still sealed baker's display unit pack
is seen here.
Bowler, batsman and wicket-keeper with a
pair of stumps . . . is it a pair; or six? What about the bailes, or are they
bail's, does anyone other than Wisden's
editor give an ess aitch one tee? I have had a couple of loose ones come in
over the last 7 years as well; both the 'common' poses.
There are various reasons for why Culpitt's might have been behind the
pulling of these two poses, the most obvious being that they are both rather
stiff poses, the reaching guy is a brave attempt at an animated pose, but he
looks like a Tantric Yoga teacher, not a cricketer, while the other guy looks
as if he's waiting for a reaction to a joke he just told - or looking for a
fight!
And, for them to be useful, you'd need more
than two, AND a very big cake! This may mean that there's an unused stash of
them somewhere though . . . but they were both impractical; the three-man
vignette could fit nicely on a small round or square cake, and be a nice surprise
for a cricketing fan.
My brother and I got hedgehogs (made with
chocolate finger biscuits) until we were old enough to get stockade-forts -
made with chocolate fingers! The forts had Cowboys and Indians - Herald Hong Kong if I remember rightly .
. . early-mid 1970's; Deetail weren't
out yet! One year I rebelled against the hedgehog and asked for a ladybird!
While sorting spare stumps for a mate, I
noticed two things; 1) they seem to have been cut from triple-stump mouldings
(sometimes not terribly accurately - if you're going to glue them to/with cream
or fondant icing; I guess it doesn't matter), and 2) that there are (were!) two
generations, with narrower and broader base-depths.
No comments:
Post a Comment