About Me
- Hugh Walter
- No Fixed Abode, Home Counties, United Kingdom
- I’m a 60-year-old Aspergic gardening CAD-Monkey. Sardonic, cynical and with the political leanings of a social reformer, I’m also a toy and model figure collector, particularly interested in the history of plastics and plastic toys. Other interests are history, current affairs, modern art, and architecture, gardening and natural history. I love plain chocolate, fireworks and trees, but I don’t hug them, I do hug kittens. I hate ignorance, when it can be avoided, so I hate the 'educational' establishment and pity the millions they’ve failed with teaching-to-test and rote 'learning' and I hate the short-sighted stupidity of the entire ruling/industrial elite, with their planet destroying fascism and added “buy-one-get-one-free”. Likewise, I also have no time for fools and little time for the false crap we're all supposed to pretend we haven't noticed, or the games we're supposed to play. I will 'bite the hand that feeds', to remind it why it feeds.
Sunday, March 16, 2025
L is for Lots of London Loot - Sandown February - Vehicles
Saturday, August 19, 2023
M-Toy is for Marty, May, Moon and . . . err . . . Sun!
The best place to go for the Marty story - which seems to be unique to the fantasy-Sci Fi set of aliens & barbarians (ray guns and axes!) is Shaun's site here, where one of the sets is in that same Gordy packaging as the Pikit sets we saw back at the start of this year's Rack Toy Month, so there may be a Pikit version out there, Brits?
As this catalogue is dated 1986 and makes no mention of Marty, we can safely assume from all the available evidence that Marty was a short-lived (one line) brand-mark and May Moon traded first as Maysun, then as M-Toy.
Among all the usual rack-toy guff, I thought these two were worth enlarging as they are a copy of the Raphael Lipkin set we saw here, although they may have been changed to lay flat, but it might just have been arranged like that for the catalogue images?
While the above pair were enlarged for obvious reasons! The number of times I've seen these confused with Star Toys recently is a mystery, I mean, how do you confuse rubber copies of Britains with polyethylene copies of Airfix & Timpo? And years after other people have sorted it out? Well; because, the trouble with Faceplant is that some of these guys are whittering-away [as fact] from a position of pure ignorance!
Wednesday, October 19, 2022
F is for Five! . . . Four! . . . Fire Main Engines! . . .
I only need the cake-decoration boxed set and the space-station now! Although carded I've a few gaps still in the Triang cards and still have one US Golden Astronaut card to find. We are talking Triang Spacex today, and Set 1172/16 Mobile Launching Pad, although this set was branded to Raphael Lipkin, not Triang! They were both part of 'Lines II' Triang by that time.
Looks good huh? Nice bit of cartoony psychedelia - with the electric colours and black background it's getting into back-light poster territory! And referencing the Apollo 8 launch, dates itself, or its sales-meeting conceptualisation to sometime in 1968, although the design wasn't registered until November 1969. Instruction sheet has suffered a tad from atmospheric damp over the decades and got a bit crinkled, but if Putin is preparing the West bank of the Kerson Oblast for a nuclear strike, it may well be incinerated in the next few weeks - too close to Aldershot for comfort in a populist's Armageddon!1. This is a constructional toy!
Five-stage rocket components; harking back to pulp space-ships rather than the NASA launch vehicles they should have been familiar with at the time. If a man is supposed to occupy the chromed spaceship at the tip, scale is about the same as an Apollo launcher though? And the Russians were using launch rockets with fluted engine-venturi arrangements. The base of the 'MLP', properly a Missile Crawler Transporter Facility (now just called a crawler-transporter) is a simplified affair, but a stunning thing for what would have been a 1960's pocket-money price, OK, probably a "Save your pocket-money for a few weeks darling and we'll see - your Birthday's not that far off" price, but Raphael Lipkin weren't noted for top-end toys! The gantry-tower comes in three sections (the top is photographed from both sides) which you won't be surprised to hear are called bottom, middle and top around here! Added to the tower are a crane visible on the original (see end) and two service walkways scaled around N or Z-gauge compatible. Start putting them all together and realise it's a perfect scenario for a .gif image, so go and make a .gif image . . . . . . which goes like this! Forward and reverse; it's very hard to get these .gif's 'just right', I tried slowing it down by a few hundredths of a second, and it became too slow and jumpy, but as it is, it seems a little fast, however it's quite mesmeric, so you can lose a few minutes waiting to catch the exact moment the walkways disappear . . . they appear quite obviously, but disappear in the blink of a fast eye! And a still image of the crane preparing a Swizzles Matlow sherbet-stuffed Spaceflleet 2000 supply-ship for launch! Although with that ring on the deck of the launch vehicle, it looks like it's about to suffer a drop-test . . . gotta' get the sherbet out somehow! The outer liner of the box is a slip-off, which always carries with it the danger of losing small components, so it was extra luck that everything was in the box. Also a close-up of the little space-craft which sits atop the giant firework! End panel of the inner box, not terribly exciting, but it's one of those posts where I'm showing/covering everything, or trying to, if you want more though, Paul Vreed's got it all here! The real McCoy courtesy of Wikipedia! The crane is quite good, but look at that plethora of service gantries and walkways! Sorry Mike; it was't Bill, it was me, cheer Bill for telling us!Friday, April 9, 2021
T is for Two - Mighty Antar's & Conquerors
From the rear/right; Raphael Lipkin/Pipin Toys (1:30th'ish), Dinky (1:43rd), Airfix (1:76th), Budgie (damaged), Matchbox (painted, badly!), unknown - might be Scotia? The last being two at approximately 1:125th 'box scale' and one 1:300th 'micro-armour' scale.
Anomalies include the Lipkin load being an FV 214 Conqueror rather than the Centurion (from Mk.5/1 - FV 4011) everyone else went with, the Budgie having the later cab design of the Mk.III [not 'mighty'] Antar with narrower bonnet and Matchbox having a simple rendition of the Sankey 50-Ton Tank Transporter trailer along with the error of the name 'Thornycroft' as "Thorneycroft" moulded on the base of the tractor-unit.
The micro-armour one is a curates egg, seemingly based on a ballast-body variant (draw-bar trailers, for the use of) it nevertheless has an articulated, fifth-wheel, DAF style trailer like the others, and may be based on the RAF's lone C6T variant, but with added 'saddle' fuel-tanks? The fuel tanks being used as tool-bins on the Lipkin biggie!
The recent purchase of another Conqueror from [The] Lucky Toys meant that while the Lipkin was out . . . anti-clockwise from the top left; the red version I got at Richmond-call-me-Whitton (the . . . no . . . THE Plastic Warrior show!) a couple of three-years ago!Then the standard green Lipkin one that came with the transporter (you may remember we looked at the individually boxed version a while ago and both colours were on the box-art), while bottom left is the new Lucky one - I believe a home paint in gray over the chromium-finish still visible on the tracks and running gear, and about the same as the Dinky Centurion at around 1:43rd scale.
Then the two version of Tri-Ang Conqueror (approximately 1:72nd [00-guage compatible]), one from the Minic Motorway sets (I believe) as a tank, the other from the latterly Hornby-Triang 'Battle-Space' line of the wider railway range, as a well-wagon/flat-car load with twin rocket-launcher turret and finally two box-scale (1:76th'ish or smaller?) Tri-Ang Minic's configured as imagi-nation armoured cars but with scaled-down Conqueror turrets!
Instead of an anomaly, we have a coincidence with these; they are all equipped with push-and-go motors! Actually - maybe the train one isn't; just free-rolling? I've sent them to the storage unit now!
For those who don't know the Conqueror; it was a post-war super-heavy tank in the same family as the Soviet Russian Joseph Stalin - JSIII and American M103. The Lipkin is probably the closest to the real thing, turret-wise, but none of them really do the actual vehicle full-justice.The Lucky Toy's model (new to me when I saw it on evilBay for no money! What else is out there?) is clearly a copy of the Tri-Ang rendition, scaled-up and with an integrally-moulded, non-revolving turret and equally integral radio-aerial.
Base-mark; aft of the forward axle's push-and-go motor housing, which is very similar to the one fitted to TAT (see tags)'s Universal/Bren-carrier, and their dime-store lorry-copy. I don't know if there is any significance to the 'v' suffix of the model-number, or if it just means 'v-ehicle' range?





































