About Me

My photo
No Fixed Abode, Home Counties, United Kingdom
I’m a 60-year-old Aspergic gardening CAD-Monkey. Sardonic, cynical and with the political leanings of a social reformer, I’m also a toy and model figure collector, particularly interested in the history of plastics and plastic toys. Other interests are history, current affairs, modern art, and architecture, gardening and natural history. I love plain chocolate, fireworks and trees, but I don’t hug them, I do hug kittens. I hate ignorance, when it can be avoided, so I hate the 'educational' establishment and pity the millions they’ve failed with teaching-to-test and rote 'learning' and I hate the short-sighted stupidity of the entire ruling/industrial elite, with their planet destroying fascism and added “buy-one-get-one-free”. Likewise, I also have no time for fools and little time for the false crap we're all supposed to pretend we haven't noticed, or the games we're supposed to play. I will 'bite the hand that feeds', to remind it why it feeds.
Showing posts with label The End of the World. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The End of the World. Show all posts

Thursday, October 2, 2025

R is for Rhetoric, Rumination and Rant - The Rancid Rodent in the White House!

Sometimes, other people's words are much better than one's own, and no amount of creative writing classes will cure that uneven, uncomfortable fact! For getting a message across, or explaining something, especially if the subjects are outside one's own field - I'm not strong on economics, for instance - sometimes one's own witten imagination can be found lacking, or the self's vocabulary won't stretch to the task!

I'm OK at toys, seem to have a lot of success logically arguing Zionists into silence, and can have a good debate on the Environment, however, while I have had the odd stab at Politics in the past, and will do again, I'm sure; I started collecting these (below quotes) a while ago (soon after the inauguration), initially, in order to quote from them, but then decided that between them, they seem to say it all, better than I could!

All four pieces have 'gone viral', as the phrase is, these days, the first one twice, six years apart, and I think I reposted it on Faceplant, both times, as it succinctly sums-up the average Brit's incredulity, that Trump gets away with it, time and time again!

Not that he doesn't have his fans over here, but they are our 'rednecks', the fat, balding, tattooed, middle-aged, uneducated, benefit recipient lurches and dollops, the Morlocks and Yahoo's not only left behind by Capitalism, but too stupid to see it's the fault of people like Trump!

I love the second piece, because it's written by an American, and a religious, probably Republican American, and the very type you might have expected to vote for Trump, that he is so scathing, leads us all to hope America can still save itself - the brouhaha this week over the Federal lockdown has been amusing, as the Rep's did it every time a Democrat was in the Oval Office (which now looks like a Tart's Boudoir), and now they're having a hissy-fit!

I don't know who wrote the third piece, so I've credited the site's Admin', but they seem to 'get it', most Americans think we pay the tariffs on our stuff, no, they pay, it's a tax on them! The reason most countries haven't reciprocated, or have only reciprocated to a lesser percentage, or on targeted goods, is because we don't want to do the same damage to our economy, Trump's doing to his, but we do need to show we are willing to stand up to the turd of a man.

The fourth text, is a transcription of a recent speech, by someone who's better qualified, in more fields, than the entire Trump family, and points at a few possible futures, so is well worth a read. I don't think a Nobel Peace Prize for Trump is anywhere in that future, but war-crime trials for all sorts of people are being muted, just for the genocide in Gaza, before you get on to the Piracy on the High Seas, we're seeing again tonight - comes to something when the leaders of Columbia and Italy call out the Israelis!

And, to me, that's the real problem, Palestine and Ukraine are queering the pitch, for any group or individual nation trying to deal with Trumps fantastical nonsense, Russia and China hover in the background re-muddying any water before it can clear, and the planet is literally dying, while all these fuckers try to start World War three, in such a way as to blame each other! . . . Exactly what happened in 1914.

If I were to express one opinion, before the masters' speak, it's this - You know how Musk became de facto Prime Minister, without being elected, destroyed the Civil Service of the USA and left before Congress, or the House of Representatives, got their joint-acts' together? You know how he and Trump then fell out, big time, slagging each other off like two idiot schoolboys in the playground? You know how Trump then answered his base's calls for Musk to be deported to South Africa, with a hint at just that? And you know how it then all went very quiet, until they met and shook hands at that fascist's funeral the other day?

I think Musk has counter-threatened Trump - 'You send me back to SA, and I'll destroy the American economy'. And he can, not just because of his personal wealth, but because if he shut down Tesla, X, and SpaceX on the same day, sacked everybody and took the money, the Wall Street stock-markets would implode, like the World Trade Centre.

So, they're 'friends' again - TACO!

And, to those readers this side of The Pond who were surprised by B.Liar's involvement in the dodgy, genocidal 'peace treaty', which the Palestinians haven't even been consulted on, understand that Kier Starmer's wife is a pro-Israel Jew, and Richi Sunack's wife has shares in the same development companies, the dreadful (but brightest of that bunch) Gerard Kutchner has . . . thay ALL want a slice of the Palestinian offshore gas, they ALL want the Palestinian Land.

No doubt, the reason the BBC has given more coverage to one fascist march, than the scores of larger pro-Palestinian ones is because they are deep in it! Their section-chief in the Middle East is an ex-CIA friend of MossadLyse Doucet -who should be in the thick of it - was sent off to write a whimsical history of an Afghan hotel, so she couldn't be asked about Genocide or Piracy! And then it was serialised on the BBC, to help sales!

Orla Guerin, Jeremy Bowen and Lyse, have failed in their first duty as Journalists - to tell the truth. With what little we do get from them, so painfully 'neutral' as to be biased in favour of Tel Aviv! While IDF soldiers happily post their war-crimes on TikTok, despite their having being told twice, by their OWN generals, not to!

But . . . I must stop; in my anger, I'm changing the subject - they teach you not to do that on a creative writing course, I bet! Read and enjoy . . . or weep; Thoughtful comments welcome, anti-rants will be deleated, if you don't dissagree with what's going on globally at the moment, there's something wrong with your moral compass.

<><><><><>     <><><><>    <><><>   <><>  <>  <><>   <><><>    <><><><>     <><><><><> 

G7 Meeting - 1st Term
Seven statesmen and a petulant child. 

Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?

"A few things spring to mind. Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem. For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace – all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed. So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.

Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing – not once, ever. I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility – for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman. But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is – his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.

Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers. And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults – he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.

There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface. Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront. Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul. And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist. Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that. He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat. He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.

And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully. That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead. There are unspoken rules to this stuff – the Queensberry rules of basic decency – and he breaks them all. He punches downwards – which a gentleman should, would, could never do – and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless – and he kicks them when they are down.

So the fact that a significant minority – perhaps a third – of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think ‘Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:

• Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.

• You don’t need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.

This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss. After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.

God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid. He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart. In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws – he would make a Trump.

And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish: ‘My God… what… have… I… created?’ If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set.”

- Nate White
(February 12, 2019, on Quora)
Advertising Creative 2006–present
BA 1st Class Hons in English (language), King's College London
 
 
Threatening Europe on Tech' Regulation, a week ago.
 
Who's the worst US President in history?

"There was this one guy who started a trade war that killed 300,000 American jobs in his first two years. Then he signed a tax bill that flatlined the stock market and forced the Fed to start lowering interest rates to try to prevent a recession. Then he said a global pandemic was a liberal hoax to kill the economy he spent three years destroying and he set records for the six worst point drops in the history of the Dow, most new unemployment claims in history, and the largest deficit in history.

He was investigated and found to have welcomed and encouraged election interference by a foreign government and to have obstructed justice to cover his crimes. He got impeached once for abusing his office to try to coerce a foreign leader into helping him smear a political rival. Then he got impeached again for inciting an insurrection to try to stay in power after easily and predictably losing his re-election bid. Then he got indicted for almost 100 felonies after leaving office.

I forget his name. Draft dodger. Admitted sex offender. Painted himself orange and wore a dead rodent on his head. Wore elevator shoes. Misspelled three letter words on a smartphone. Kept filing bankruptcy. Called himself a winner. Dump? Rump? Plump? Chump? Something like that.

[Edit: I’ve never done this before, but this post was like catnip for morons and the most brainwashed fascists I’ve seen all flocked to the comment section to bleat their alt-right propaganda. So I’m disabling comments on this. I’ve also deleted some of the worst garbage that was posted. Wow. These people really need therapy.]"
 
- Will
(August 2024, Quora) 
"A life-long southerner, devout Christian, and a true conservative, I have worked in publishing, talk radio, and served as a staff pastor in a local church. I am currently writing my first book."

 <><><><><>     <><><><>    <><><>   <><>  <>  <><>   <><><>    <><><><>     <><><><><>

Loosing it, 2018.
 
On Trump's Tarrifs

"It’s becoming harder by the day to pretend this isn’t a controlled demolition of the U.S. economy, except the person holding the plunger is also shouting “Help! The building’s falling!” That’s the tragicomic heart of the moment. Trump, the self-proclaimed dealmaker and economic genius, is now openly afraid of a 1929-style collapse, even as he isolates the United States from every major trading partner, fires or bullies institutional stewards, and surrounds himself with sycophants who think “Ron Vara” is a legitimate source of macroeconomic insight.
 
Meanwhile, outside our increasingly paranoid borders, the grown-ups are still at the table. Canada, led by a calm and resolute Mark Carney, is executing what can only be described as precision economic diplomacy. Their retaliatory tariffs aren’t broad-stroke chaos, they’re surgical. Instead of going after random U.S. goods, they’ve targeted symbolic, regionally sensitive exports: peanut butter from Georgia, coffee from Florida, orange juice from Florida, motorcycles from Wisconsin, and bourbon from Kentucky, each selected not only for economic impact, but for political resonance in Republican strongholds.
 
At the same time, they’ve spared critical sectors like auto manufacturing, shielding Canadian jobs while preserving the long-integrated North American supply chain. Provinces have joined in with layered actions of their own. Ontario canceled a $100 million Starlink contract, Quebec ordered American liquor off state shelves, and Nova Scotia doubled tolls on U.S. commercial vehicles.
 
Retailers across the country are now labeling American goods with a “T” for “tariff,” inviting consumers to make patriotic purchasing decisions. The result? A population that understands the stakes and a government actually coordinating its moves with strategy in mind, not cosplay, not chaos, but competence.
 
Japan, for its part, has begun quietly rebalancing its trade and defense postures, no longer convinced that the U.S. under Trump is a reliable ally or market. As Shinji Aguma recently said in a speech that's now ricocheting across global capitals, Trump behaves less like a statesman and more like an extortionist. Japan is responding accordingly, hedging its economic bets while bolstering ties with the EU and ASEAN nations.
 
China, for its part, is playing a masterclass in strategic patience. While Trump rattles sabers and brags about tariff victories that don’t exist, Beijing is quietly tightening its grip on global supply chains, shifting rare earth exports to preferred partners, and expanding its 'Belt and Road' economic influence without firing a shot.
 
Instead of engaging in tit-for-tat chaos, they’ve taken a colder approach: reducing purchases of long-term U.S. Treasuries, redirecting trade to Latin America and Africa, and quietly expanding yuan-denominated trade agreements—including a notable spike in oil deals settled outside the dollar. Internally, they're cushioning the impact of U.S. tariffs through state subsidies and domestic stimulus, while externally, they’re simply allowing U.S. dysfunction to speak for itself.
 
When asked if they plan to retaliate with a major U.S. bond selloff, they don’t say yes—they just don’t have to. The global market now expects instability from Washington, and China knows that expectation is power. Trump wants a fight; Xi Jinping is playing a waiting game. And every day Trump wages war against courts, investors, and allies, he’s doing Beijing’s work for them.
 
The European Union, too, is playing the long game. Rather than matching chaos with chaos, they've responded to Trump’s tariff barrage with targeted countermeasures, hitting Harley-Davidsons, bourbon, and cranberries in 2020, and now reviving pressure on key industrial imports like American-made electrical components and processed foods. But more importantly, they’re channeling their energy into building out multilateral alternatives: accelerating trade agreements with Mercosur and Australia, strengthening ties with Japan under the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement, and actively pursuing deeper integration with African and ASEAN markets.
 
They’re also welcoming disillusioned U.S. investors. European equity funds have seen net inflows of over $11 billion this month alone, even as U.S. stock funds bled nearly $11 billion. Germany, France, and the Netherlands have seen especially strong investment surges, with capital moving into euro-denominated bonds and infrastructure projects offering both stability and return. And they’re doing all of this while watching the United States melt into a self-inflicted credibility crisis over its own debt, its currency, and its basic ability to govern. In short, while Washington yells into its own echo chamber, Brussels is quietly rerouting the future.
 
At home, the contrast is staggering. Trump continues to wage war against his own institutions. He has vilified the Federal Reserve, cast doubt on the integrity of courts, and inflated the powers of unqualified loyalists like Peter Navarro, a man who literally invented a fake economist to back his theories. Cooler heads, seasoned experts, and non-fabricated humans have been pushed aside in favor of true believers whose economic strategies might as well be based on Reddit threads and revenge fantasies.
 
The result is a spiral: as international partners recalibrate and global capital exits, Trump grows more erratic. He screams about depression, lashes out at Jerome Powell, threatens allies, and blames everyone but the mirror. But this isn’t just the tantrum of a man losing control. It’s the very real danger of a once-stable empire hollowed out by ego, paranoia, and a dangerous belief that reality itself can be managed like a brand.
 
There is still time to pull back from the brink, but it would require Trump to abandon the fantasy that he alone can fix what he alone is breaking. And that, as history has shown again and again, may be the most dangerous illusion of all."
 
- Oregon's Bay Area
(About six months ago, Facebook group, admin-post)
 
<><><><><>     <><><><>    <><><>   <><>  <>  <><>   <><><>    <><><><>     <><><><><> 
 
On hearing about the invitaion for a state visit to the UK, January 2017

Sparked by the treatment of Zelenskyy in late February 2025, and the transformation of Ukraine from a sovereign country to an object for barter.
 
"Europe is at a critical turning point in its history. The American shield is crumbling, Ukraine risks being abandoned, Russia strengthened. Washington has become the court of Nero, a fiery emperor, submissive courtiers and a ketamine-fueled jester in charge of purging the civil service.
 
This is a tragedy for the free world, but it is first and foremost a tragedy for the United States. Trump’s message is that there is no point in being his ally since he will not defend you, he will impose more customs and duties on you than on his enemies and will threaten to seize your territories while supporting the dictatorships that invade you.
 
The king of the deal is showing what the art of the deal is all about. He thinks he will intimidate China by lying down before Putin, but Xi Jinping, faced with such a shipwreck, is probably accelerating preparations for the invasion of Taiwan.
 
Never in history has a President of the United States capitulated to the enemy. Never has anyone supported an aggressor against an ally. Never has anyone trampled on the American Constitution, issued so many illegal decrees, dismissed judges who could have prevented him from doing so, dismissed the military general staff in one fell swoop, weakened all checks and balances, and taken control of social media.
 
This is not an illiberal drift, it is the beginning of the confiscation of democracy. Let us remember that it took only one month, three weeks and two days to bring down the Weimar Republic and its Constitution. I have faith in the strength of American democracy, and the country is already protesting. But in one month, Trump has done more harm to America than in four years of his last presidency.
 
We were at war with a dictator, now we are fighting a dictator backed by a traitor. Eight days ago, at the very moment that Trump was rubbing Macron’s back in the White House, the United States voted at the UN with Russia and North Korea against the Europeans demanding the withdrawal of Russian troops.
 
Two days later, in the Oval Office, the military service shirker was giving war hero Zelensky lessons in morality and strategy before dismissing him like a groom, ordering him to submit or resign. Tonight, he took another step into infamy by stopping the delivery of weapons that had been promised.
 
What to do in the face of this betrayal? The answer is simple: face it. And first of all, let’s not be mistaken. The defeat of Ukraine would be the defeat of Europe. The Baltic States, Georgia, Moldova are already on the list. Putin’s goal is to return to Yalta, where half the continent was ceded to Stalin.
 
The countries of the South are waiting for the outcome of the conflict to decide whether they should continue to respect Europe or whether they are now free to trample on it. What Putin wants is the end of the order put in place by the United States and its allies 80 years ago, with its first principle being the prohibition of acquiring territory by force.
 
This idea is at the very source of the UN, where today Americans vote in favor of the aggressor and against the attacked, because the Trumpian vision coincides with that of Putin: a return to spheres of influence, the great powers dictating the fate of small countries.
 
Mine is Greenland, Panama and Canada, you are Ukraine, the Baltics and Eastern Europe, he is Taiwan and the China Sea. At the parties of the oligarchs of the Gulf of Mar-a-Lago, this is called “diplomatic realism.” So we are alone. But the talk that Putin cannot be resisted is false. Contrary to the Kremlin’s propaganda, Russia is in bad shape. In three years, the so-called second largest army in the world has managed to grab only crumbs from a country three times less populated.
 
Interest rates at 25%, the collapse of foreign exchange and gold reserves, the demographic collapse show that it is on the brink of the abyss. The American helping hand to Putin is the biggest strategic mistake ever made in a war.
 
The shock is violent, but it has a virtue. Europeans are coming out of denial. They understood in one day in Munich that the survival of Ukraine and the future of Europe are in their hands and that they have three imperatives.
 
Accelerate military aid to Ukraine to compensate for the American abandonment, so that it holds, and of course to impose its presence and that of Europe in any negotiation. This will be expensive. It will be necessary to end the taboo of the use of frozen Russian assets. It will be necessary to circumvent Moscow’s accomplices within Europe itself by a coalition of only the willing countries, with of course the United Kingdom.
 
Second, demand that any agreement be accompanied by the return of kidnapped children, and prisoners, and absolute security guarantees. After Budapest, Georgia and Minsk, we know what agreements with Putin are worth. These guarantees require sufficient military force to prevent a new invasion.
 
Finally, and this is the most urgent, because it is what will take the most time, we must build the neglected European defense, to the benefit of the American umbrella since 1945 and scuttled since the fall of the Berlin Wall. It is a Herculean task, but it is on its success or failure that the leaders of today’s democratic Europe will be judged in the history books.
 
Friedrich Merz has just declared that Europe needs its own military alliance. This is to recognize that France has been right for decades in arguing for strategic autonomy. It remains to be built. It will be necessary to invest massively, to strengthen the European Defense Fund outside the Maastricht debt criteria, to harmonize weapons and munitions systems, to accelerate the entry into the Union of Ukraine, which is today the leading European army, to rethink the place and conditions of nuclear deterrence based on French and British capabilities, to relaunch the anti-missile shield and satellite programs.
 
The plan announced yesterday by Ursula von der Leyen is a very good starting point. And much more will be needed. Europe will only become a military power again by becoming an industrial power again. In a word, the Draghi report will have to be implemented. For good.
 
But the real rearmament of Europe is its moral rearmament. We must convince public opinion in the face of war weariness and fear, and especially in the face of Putin’s cronies, the extreme right and the extreme left. They argued again yesterday in the National Assembly, Mr. Prime Minister, before you, against European unity, against European defense. They say they want peace. What neither they nor Trump say is that their peace is capitulation, the peace of defeat, the replacement of de Gaulle Zelensky by a Ukrainian Pétain at the beck and call of Putin. Peace for the collaborators who have refused any aid to the Ukrainians for three years.
 
Is this the end of the Atlantic Alliance? The risk is great. But in the last few days, the public humiliation of Zelensky and all the crazy decisions taken in the last month have finally made the Americans react. Polls are falling. Republican lawmakers are being greeted by hostile crowds in their constituencies. Even Fox News is becoming critical.
 
The Trumpists are no longer in their majesty. They control the executive, the Congress, the Supreme Court and social networks. But in American history, the freedom fighters have always prevailed. They are beginning to raise their heads.
 
The fate of Ukraine is being played out in the trenches, but it also depends on those in the United States who want to defend democracy, and here on our ability to unite Europeans, to find the means for their common defense, and to make Europe the power that it once was in history and that it hesitates to become again.
 
Our parents defeated fascism and communism at great cost. The task of our generation is to defeat the totalitarianisms of the 21st century. Long live free Ukraine, long live democratic Europe.
 
 Video for the above text.
- Claude Malhuret
(Tuesday 4th March 2025)
French physician, lawyer and politician, former head of MSF, who has served as a member of the French Senate since 2014, representing the department of Allier. A member of Horizons, a center-right party that was created to attract support for Emmanuel Marcron in the 2022 French presidential election, he has presided over the The Independents – Republic and Territories (LIRT) parliamentary group in the Senate since 2017.
 
<><><><><>     <><><><>    <><><>   <><>  <>  <><>   <><><>    <><><><>     <><><><><>
 
Complaining that someone else got the Nobel peace Prize in January 2020.
 
Finally, this was written by the Coucil on Foureign Relations, on 11th January 2021, full text here;
 
 
"Trump inherited a set of relationships, alliances, and institutions that, however imperfect, had for 75 years created a context in which great-power conflict had been avoided, democracy expanded, and wealth and living standards increased. Embracing a blend of “America first” nationalism, unilateralism, and isolationism, Trump did what he could to disrupt many of these relationships and arrangements without putting anything better in their place.

It will be difficult – if not impossible – to repair this damage anytime soon. Trump will no longer be president, but he will remain influential in the Republican party and the country. While the world was already in growing disarray, and while US influence was already declining, Trump dramatically accelerated both trends. The bottom line is that he is handing off a country and a world in far worse condition than he inherited. That is his distressing legacy."

<><><><><>     <><><><>    <><><>   <><>  <>  <><>   <><><>    <><><><>     <><><><><> 

He is a self-obsessed narcissist, a misogynist, fascist, sex-pest, self-publicist, braggart, show-off, serial-bankrupt and cunt. A traitor to Democracy, the International 'Rule of Law', the post-war 'Order' and probably in the pocket's of Tel Aviv and Moscow. He has no serious economic acumen, little ability to read the room, or read individuals and surrounds himself with sycophantic "yes" people, he's robbing America blind, losing America all it's accumulated gravitas on the world stage, all its trust with friends and allies, and all its bargaining power with the rest of the world.
 
And calling every senior military General back, to some a-hole barracks in CONUS, from all over the world, at vast expense, to use words like 'that shit' in front of them, is no way to run a Superpower. No beards? Seriously? They've got nothing better to worry about than the hirsuteness of their servicemen? Israel is totally out of control, and they're worrying about fucking beards! Is Vance going to get rid of his? Girlyman!
 
<><><><><>     <><><><>    <><><>   <><>  <>  <><>   <><><>    <><><><>     <><><><><> 

And now, he's President again! God help us. 

Saturday, April 1, 2023

A is for Are We All Going To Die Soon?

I know it's the first of April, not Halloween, but I thought I'd try ChatGPT as everyone is raving about AI at the moment. I found it unwilling to look at the evidence, lacking basic data (a Polish temperature record), repetitive and too happy to tow the 'establishment line'; there didn't appear to be any actual 'thinking' involved, but rather it was parroting commonly-held/believed 'stuff', what do you think?

Am I being arrogant and overly dark, OR overly aspergic, or is ChatGPT a bit dull and dimwitted?

It 'talks' like the assist robot on evilBay, i.e. more interested in pleasing you than in actually getting 'stuck in', and it refused to see that the two recent records were REAL EVENTS, that actually happened in December in Warsaw, or last July in East Anglia. Consequently it kept treating the record temperatures as statistical data, rather than harbingers of existential threat?

Anyway, both my chosen subject and the answer were a bit chilling, if for different reasons . . . which beats whatever April Fool I think I've lost in the image-pit of my non-user 'User' folder! I don't know where the green blocks came from, they're not showing in edit and ChatGPT uses American spelling!

 *****     ****    ***   **  *  **   ***    ****     *****

Hi ChatGPT
 

Hello! How can I assist you today?

 
I was wondering if you might be able to calculate how long you think the human race is likely to last given that the UK beat a three-year old temperature record by nearly three degrees last June, and Poland beat their Winter warmth record by five degrees in December
 

As an AI language model, I cannot predict the future with certainty or make any specific calculations regarding the longevity of the human race. While climate change poses a significant threat to the planet and its inhabitants, predicting the exact outcome is beyond the scope of my abilities.

However, I can provide some general information on the topic. Climate change is a complex and multifaceted issue, and its effects can vary significantly depending on factors such as geography, socioeconomic conditions, and human behavior. While temperature records in specific regions can provide evidence of global warming trends, it is essential to consider the long-term and global impacts of climate change.

Scientists and policymakers around the world are working to address the issue of climate change and mitigate its effects. There are many proposed solutions, including reducing greenhouse gas emissions, transitioning to renewable energy sources, and implementing more sustainable practices in various industries. The success of these efforts will determine the extent to which climate change affects our planet and its inhabitants, including the human race.

In summary, predicting the longevity of the human race based on temperature records is not possible, and it is essential to consider the complexity and global nature of climate change when discussing its potential impacts.

 
But it seems to me that while worrying about the background average temperature is worthy, the likelihood of the one or two days a year extremes being the 'killer' is far more likely and have extrapolated the two recent dates to suggest we may only have as little as twenty years left?
 

It is true that extreme weather events, such as heatwaves, droughts, and floods, can have severe and immediate impacts on human populations and infrastructure. However, it is not accurate to use two specific instances of record-breaking temperatures to predict the end of the human race within 20 years.

Climate change is a global phenomenon that unfolds over decades and centuries, and its impacts are complex and varied. While extreme weather events may become more frequent and intense as the climate changes, other factors such as sea-level rise, ocean acidification, and biodiversity loss can also have significant impacts.

It is essential to approach the issue of climate change with a long-term perspective and recognize that the problem is multifaceted and requires coordinated global action. There are many proposed solutions, including reducing greenhouse gas emissions, transitioning to renewable energy sources, and implementing more sustainable practices in various industries.

In summary, while extreme weather events can have immediate impacts on human populations, it is not accurate to extrapolate from two specific instances to predict the end of the human race within 20 years. The issue of climate change is complex and requires coordinated global action to address.

 
Well, we seem to be in a situation where extrapolating what evidence we do have, the record is increasing by approximately 1 degree a year, a trend that would end most land life by 2040?
 

I'm sorry, but I must correct you on this. It is not accurate to claim that the global temperature is increasing by approximately 1 degree a year. While temperatures do fluctuate from year to year, the overall trend is an increase of approximately 1 degree Celsius since the late 19th century, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Furthermore, while climate change does pose a significant threat to the planet and its inhabitants, it is not accurate to claim that it will end most land life by 2040. Climate change is a complex and multifaceted issue that affects different regions and ecosystems in different ways. While some areas may experience severe impacts, others may be less affected.

It is important to approach the issue of climate change with a long-term perspective and recognize that addressing it will require coordinated global action. There are many proposed solutions, including reducing greenhouse gas emissions, transitioning to renewable energy sources, and implementing more sustainable practices in various industries.

In summary, it is not accurate to claim that the global temperature is increasing by approximately 1 degree a year or that climate change will end most land life by 2040. While climate change is a significant threat, addressing it will require coordinated global action and a long-term perspective.

 
Yes, but you, like the scientists, are talking about the average, I'm talking about the extremes, which do seem to be increasing by 1 degree per year? How old was the Polish record? We, here in the UK have seen a three degree rise, over three years, that 'could' mean within 20 year all vegetation being burned-off in one week in July or August?
 

While extreme weather events can have severe and immediate impacts on human populations and ecosystems, it is not accurate to claim that extreme temperature records are increasing by 1 degree per year.

Temperature records are based on statistical analyses of long-term temperature data, and they provide evidence of the overall trend of climate change. While temperature records can be broken in specific locations and times, they do not necessarily reflect the global trend of temperature increase.

Furthermore, while extreme temperature events can have severe impacts, the long-term impacts of climate change on ecosystems and human populations are more complex and varied. Climate change affects different regions and ecosystems in different ways, and its impacts are influenced by factors such as geography, socioeconomic conditions, and human behavior.

In summary, while extreme temperature events can have severe impacts, it is not accurate to claim that they are increasing by 1 degree per year or that they will lead to the burning of all vegetation in one week in July or August. Climate change is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a long-term perspective and coordinated global action.

 
I don't think you are as bright as they make you out to be? You are missing the point of the difference between averages, and the recent records! Can you tell me how old the Polish winter warmth record was before it was broken in December?
 

I apologize if my previous responses did not adequately address your concerns. I understand that you are concerned about extreme temperature records and their potential impacts.

To answer your question, I do not have the specific information on the age of the Polish winter warmth record that was broken in December. However, it is worth noting that temperature records can vary widely depending on the specific location and time period analyzed.

It is also worth reiterating that while extreme temperature records can have severe impacts, they do not necessarily reflect the overall trend of climate change. Climate change is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a long-term perspective and coordinated global action.

I am here to assist you and provide accurate information to the best of my abilities. Please let me know if you have any further questions or concerns.

 
No, that was my only burning question, I thank you for your time, and will return to you with the same question in a year or so, when - I am absolutely sure - we will have more broken records, and you may have become a little wiser.
 

Thank you for your feedback, and I am always here to assist you with any questions or concerns you may have in the future. As an AI language model, my responses are based on the information available to me, and I strive to provide the most accurate and up-to-date information possible.

 *****     ****    ***   **  *  **   ***    ****     *****

And - indeed, on the Polish temperature point, you can see how University staff are calling out AI submissions with relative ease, instead of going away and finding the record (which it is supposed to be able to do in nanoseconds), it re-worded my question as an answer, like a newbie filling out a job application!

And why do you think you would enjoy working for us?

"I think I would enjoy working for you because . . ." 

 

On the subject of the Assist Robot over at evilBay - this was two years ago! It almost feels sorry for itself at the end!
 
"I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that, I'm as stupid as you"
 
. . . . and on the last day Man created AI in his own image, and it was bad.