So we looked at these a while ago and I asked
whether they might be post-war, maybe East German or Russian parodies of Nazi's
as part of some propaganda exercise, possibly cigarette premiums, but I had
shot them hurriedly, at a show, and had not had time to investigate them
properly.
Now that I have looked at them closely (they
are in the collection!) the only fact remaining from the earlier musing would
seem to be . . . they might have been cigarette premiums! Everything else is up
for grabs!
The first clue is that they are all marked DRGM
(Deutsches
Reich Gebrauchs Muster = a minor patent or registered design), which
was [one of] the German equivalent[s] (they had dozens) of the English
'Pat.Pend' or French/Italian Depose, and which ran from before
the Nazi rule, until after it, so wherever they came from, the evidence says it
was within the confines of either 'greater Germany' or the later West Germany?
The next clue is that the flag has a large
swastika clearly visible upon it, and if you're wondering why I obliterated the
swastikas on the Atlantic set but not
here; it's simply that the Atlantic
set is a weird modern 'homage' to a vile, murderous, militarised, yet 'civilian'
political regime, while these - as we will see - are probably 'historical
artifacts' - it's all about context!
Another possible clue is the short arms on
the flag's swastikas, which could point to something? Did the SA
use short arms; production likely during the NAZI period, or did the
artist not know the correct dimensions because it was so new; production likely
before the Nazis came to power?
Swastikas are also suggested on several
arm-bands, and the reason this is such a clue is that the showing of Nazi
iconography was made illegal soon after the end of the war as part of the
de-Nazification effort, which means we can probably rule out West Germany, as
we have now ruled-out the East.
Which leaves the figures as German-made and
set in or just before the Nazi's came to power? Here we see that the helmeted
figures have the side-studs for mounting things like face -guards/visors on,
and - while the tops have been rendered slightly flatter by removal from the
runner - still, the lines of the helmet are the squarer one of WWI Stosstruppen
'Boxheads', rather than the later,
rounder/cleaner-lined one which 'soldiered-on' with the West German
fire-brigade until quite recently.
Other clues include the grey-green coated
figures; the Germans used a very similar coating on their steel training
ammunition to prevent surface-rust (arrowed - where the varnish seal was broken
extracting the black-powder) in storage, while it is a neutral varnish to the
figures green, the thinness, with metal showing through, and the all-over, thin-wash,
one-coat nature is the same, it's not conclusive evidence, it's a clue, and it
allows me to show you a rare'ish piece of militaria!.
Bit of a departure mid-post, but I'd better
explain; The rounds (stained pink for an unknown reason; mould inhibitor,
'live' status designator?) are wooden, they would not have travelled far, or
done much damage, but at short ranges (indoor or pipe-ranges) might have marked
a target, while on exercise; they would have provided realistic 'kick', noise
and smoke/smell, and could launch rifle-grenades without mishap. However, the hollow in the wooden bullet, would have caused
drag-turbulence and lost momentum very quickly - they are basically blanks!
The cases are steel (cheaper than brass; by
'43 they were losing the war) and compared here with a modern 5.56mm SA80
blank-round (which is brass). They are sitting in the magazine re-loading clip
they came with, which is very similar to the ones we used with SLR's in the
1980's (but then the cartridge bases are near identical on both rounds) but
this is stainless, or a non-ferrous steel-like alloy , while ours were steel,
painted gun-black and would rust in damp pouches!
They were de-activated many years ago by
yours truly, who put the black powder to good use, that is; if you consider
Tobin and myself nearly blowing our faces off with a home-made chair-leg cannon
and then almost drilling a large hole in my brother's head with a tractor-wheel
bolt-grenade 'good use', otherwise the black-powder was recklessly used in
haste, dangerously, but all three of us had a brilliant afternoon - 41 years
ago, summer half-term!
So, back to the figures; there are several
possible scenarios, the first (1) still being that they were piss-taking
parodies?
But now of German origin (rather than the Ost
Deutsche or Soviet proposed last time) and from someone on the 'Left',
satirising the early Nazi's; all that prancing about with Ernst Rohm and
his mob of bully-boy, brown-shirt, boy-scout SA, happy-campers! And
most of the figures are wearing the little SA kepi?
Being manufactured before they came to power,
in which case it's a fair bet everyone involved in these figures may have
ended-up in a concentration camp, a - likely - fate which would add a certain
poignancy to the set.
But then - Rohm was a bit of a short-arse? If the
'Hitler' character (third from left?) is a piss-take of Rohm, these could be SS
or
NSADP-sanctioned (2) piss-takes of the SA, in order to prepare
the ground for The Night of the Long Knives? Or even - referring back to the same, in
order to explain/excuse [propagandise] it, after the event?
I can only find this and while he was banned by the Nazi's, he wasn't killed, and his style is different?
Or . . . (3) that they were comedy
figures - but possibly based on characters that would have been known to the
populace at the time, perhaps from a newspaper strip-cartoon?
Taking the Mickey out of one's own military
in order to humanise it (especially when it's rightly regarded as the
instrument of a totalitarian, fascist dictatorship, busy 'disappearing' people
in the middle of the night . . . or broad daylight!) has a rich history . . .
. . . one thinks of Old Bill and Woodbine Willy
in WWI, the 'Two Types' in WWII, or Bilko, Beetle Bailey, Dad's Army,
It 'Aint Half Hot Mum, ITMAR and The Navy Lark on radio or MASH,
and all the great double acts; Abbot & Costello, Bud & Lou, Laurel
& Hardy had/did military parodies?
This guy almost looks 'familiar', was he
one of the characters in a series of Nazi propaganda posters, or have I just
Blogged him too much?!!
Lined-up with a few known-WHW's, were they - indeed - (4) comedy WHW's?
From the left we have a bisque miner from a
set of profession/occupation broach-figures (pin rusted to almost nothing), a
composition pilot with string-hanger hole in his floatation collar (no Mae West
'boobies' for the Luftwaffe!) possibly from Elastolin
or Lineol (?), two of the aluminium
figures, one polished, the other coated, an unpainted WHW policeman, a painted 'historical uniform' figure (I seem to
recall they were issued as Guard Regiments
of Berlin) and one from the set we looked at the other day.
The police set has been tied-in to the Gau
of Berlin (as issuer) also, but there are actually several versions, painted,
unpainted and heavier-based, so like the commoner 'combat' set, there seems to
be a history of multiple issues and/or multiple
issuers behind the set.
Finally (5) they could be 'just' post-war
parodies, getting out before the ban on Nazi regalia and iconography took hold?
But I think - now - we are looking at something earlier.
Unifying the animal samples for a
comparison/completion shot or two I can report that they are all unmarked with
the exception of the rhinoceros which is clearly marked 'FOREIGN', suggesting
they (some or all?) were imported into the UK at some point, where they would
most likely have been Christmas cracker novelties.
The similarities in base are unmistakeable,
but the animals - both farm/domestic and zoo/wild are of a slightly poorer
finish, so a late use of older moulds perhaps? Hanomag and Fokker are
still going strong, Elastolin
survived until the 1990's, no reason why a small toy-maker or metal-fabricator
from the Nazi-era shouldn't have dug it's old animal moulds out in the 1950's
or '60's and run them again?
Mine have come as two, small, mixed lots
(farm & zoo together both times), possibly with the Rhino' separate (I've
rather lost track of them all by blogging them in the wrong order!), so it's
all only conjecture, but I think a common-source is quite likely, especially as
flats are often ID'able from the nuances of the bases, not that these -
injection-moulded alloy - are exactly 'traditional' zinn flats!
