About Me

My photo
No Fixed Abode, Home Counties, United Kingdom
I’m a 60-year-old Aspergic gardening CAD-Monkey. Sardonic, cynical and with the political leanings of a social reformer, I’m also a toy and model figure collector, particularly interested in the history of plastics and plastic toys. Other interests are history, current affairs, modern art, and architecture, gardening and natural history. I love plain chocolate, fireworks and trees, but I don’t hug them, I do hug kittens. I hate ignorance, when it can be avoided, so I hate the 'educational' establishment and pity the millions they’ve failed with teaching-to-test and rote 'learning' and I hate the short-sighted stupidity of the entire ruling/industrial elite, with their planet destroying fascism and added “buy-one-get-one-free”. Likewise, I also have no time for fools and little time for the false crap we're all supposed to pretend we haven't noticed, or the games we're supposed to play. I will 'bite the hand that feeds', to remind it why it feeds.

Saturday, January 7, 2017

B is for Bonus Post


Well, you didn't think I'd confine you to 24 hours of looking at the rest of today's posted crap did you? It's the first post-Christmas day of the New Year - that's got to be worth celebrating!

We've seen it before here, but today's shots are not collaged so each should enlarge in 'New Tab' to an exra-embiggened state of embiggeration!





Box-ticker really, Timpo 'Plasma Tent', in reality it's a scrim-net off-cut 'basher'with a stretcher-case who happens to have a plasma bottle hooked to the net, but when you're 8 years old plasma-tent sounds better than non-combative injured Allied soldier getting in the way!

I've lost the ammo-box which doubles as a first-aid kit, but hopefully it's still in the bottom of the tub? If not he can hold a weapon, but that makes them both a target - Doh!

S is for Self Advertising

Being my rebuttal of Paul Stadinger (the Jabbering Fuck)'s post, co-starring a Cock-wackin' Monkey-lizard called Erwin Sell, dated 17th December 2015


Part 4 - Some Other Bits

This is the last one for now, I promise! I say "for now" as we are promised more from the desperately, dastardly, dishonest, duo and I may wish to reply to them again, however if it's going to be this easy to destroy their joint-reputations I may well leave it to intelligent people to make-up their own minds - and for the idiots to believe what they wish in this: the post-facts, 'Post Truth' (OED word-of-the-year 2016, although it's two words!) age!

In the comments we looked at earlier today, Erwin charged me with - and as always I'll quote in full to avoid charges of being deliberately misleading -

"He constantly go in minor blogs attacking or self advertising."

Well, as the first word on 1980's Fantasy figures I'm not sure I'd describe Shaun's Blog as 'minor', not sure at all, and I've posted more links to it, than from it, but let's compare and contrast from one of the few times the Cock-wackin' Monkey-lizard and myself have commented on the same post, shall we? Yeah, lets!

This was my comment; I'd sum it up as -

Nice, glad to know that, I think I might have one or two, thanks for posting.

This was Erwin's comment on the same post; I'd sum it up as -

Nice. Look at me, listen to me, look what I know, look at me, listen to me, look what I know, here's some more stuff I know! Look! Listen!

Who is 'self advertising' exactly? I could do the same exercise on the 54mm WWII Blog, where once or twice we have both commented on the same post, but A) I don't really want to drag other people into this, and B) The Cock-wackin' monkey-lizard has already tried to start a fight there, I ignored his recent comment on that one!

And I'm not saying there's anything wrong with his comment per.se, but there's an element of pot and kettle here, again! More hypocrisy; I've accused him of making-up specific claims about the history of one or two toy companies, which he hasn't addressed, instead he's accusing me of anything and everything he can think of, even if he's equally 'guilty'!

Now all this is all going to get frightfully tedious, but they started it (long before my October post) and I'll finish it when I'm good and ready (actually I think I said above I might leave it! Hypocrisy Hugh! We'll see what their part two says!), it the meantime it would appear that I owe them my thanks, as the feedback voting boxes under my posts hardly ever get a look-in, but the October post . . .

. . . raised three votes in favour of more! So by indulging themselves in their desire to help me destroy their reputations live on t'Internet, they are also - apparently - pleasing a number of the followers of this Blog, who seem to enjoy me losing my cool occasionally; train-wrecks - everyone just loves them!

===============================================================

Apropos Redbox . . .  and their relationship with Blue Box and Tai Sang Toys

Red Box Canada's Corporate Structure (in French!)
Major to minor - top to bottom

I don't want the A-Z to become a 'correcting Erwin's bullshit' exercise; and/but it is a fact that I was not ready to publish the Blue Box A-Z entry when I did, in support of my accusations, back in October.

Now - it's doesn't matter particularly, as editing the Blue Box page alongside the Erwin J'accuse was itself a good exercise - in self-discipline, and when I published I was reasonably happy with the level of detail as against Erwin's bullshit.

However, as the Red Box-Blue Box thing was a late entry to the 12,000-worder, there was work to be done, and when I realised that Tai Sang was extant, I did the little News, Views... piece, because I'm honest, and we're all on a learning curve.

It was also the prime opportunity for Erwin to use the information to satisfy himself he was wrong - instead he's found some minimal evidence [proving he was wrong], and has tried presenting it above as if it doesn't!

The reason the A-Z had to be as accurate as possible, and the J'accuse as long as 12,000 words is that when you are dealing with a fraud, if you don't cover every point at both ends, if you don't cross every tee and dot every eye, they will find a way to wriggle out of it and we see this with him trying to conflate his original . . .

" RED BOX is a 1985.Was original funded in HK and united with others from other toys line in China after 90’s. It has been BLUE BOX main competitor since from china market. It has “”wrongly mentioned”” as same or part as Blue Box companies in PW magazine incorrect. They are two complete different companies"

. . . with the semi-autonomy that the various 'parts' of the Tai Sang 'whole' enjoy now; post the 1997 reunification or 'hand-back', but that's not the context in which he used it (one of his too long, nothing to do with the question, 'look what I know' volunteered 'answers'), although you can make "…since from China Market" mean whatever you want it too!

That's what frauds do, they twist things until it suits their purpose, but he was attacking a Plastic Warrior article written while he was barely out of nappies, referring to the Blue Box - Red Box of the 1970's, he set the agenda of this particular gripe way back, and now tries to get out of it by talking about the companies today.

But you can't misinterpret "…two complete different companies" or "…main competitor"

===============================================================

Here are the notes and working drafts on the various other elements of the Tai Sang Group including updates for Blue Box Holdings and RBI

It's all still a bit scratchy, but by chucking it up here, it saves Erwin finding it and miss-presenting it as he did with the catalogue!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Will be new entry - Motormax - See; Redbox and Zee Toys

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Will be new entry - Red Box-Blue Box - See; Blue Box and Redbox

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Will be new entry - Tai Sang / Tai Sang Industrial Company Ltd. / Tai Sang Toys

Tai Sang Industrial Company Ltd. - Blue-Box House, 34 Sands Street, Kennedy Town, Hong Kong

Tai Sang Industrial Company Ltd. - 9/F Blue Box Factory Building, 25 Hing Wo Street, Aberdeen, Hong Kong, China

Tai Sang Industrial Company Ltd. - 9/F, 15-25 Hing Wo Street, Tin Wan, Aberdeen, Hong Kong, China (Current - although still known locally as the 'Old Blue Box Building', it now has many tenants)

Ridout & Maybee LLP - 250 University Avenue, 5th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5H 3E5, Canada (Legal representatives for intellectual property/brand marking in Canada)

Tel: +1 2552 8286
Fax: +852 31295296

Peter Chan Pui - Chairman/CEO (until demise), Chan Kwok Bun - Managing Director (current),

See also; Blue Box (for main history), Cheerful Toy, Hitech (Electronic Manufacturing Ltd.), Motormax, Redbox, and Talentoy Ltd.

Formal registration/establishment in its current form in 1960, after Peter Chan Pui bought-out the backers who had bankrolled the formation of the original Tai Sang

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notes / additions - for new Tai Sang entry and old Blue Box entry - needs sorting

Blue Box (OEM) Ltd. - 9/F Blue Box Fty Bldg, 25 Hing Wo St - Aberdeen, Hong Kong (founded 1992)

Blue Box Autraila Pty, Ltd. - C/O: George Tauber, 449 High Street, Prahran, Victoria 3181, Australia (late 1960's-early 1970's)

Phone: 852 - 312 95 295 (Tai Sang Industrial Company Ltd.,)
Fax: 852 - 281 40 527 (Tai Sang Industrial Company Ltd.,)
Phone: +852 3510 0100 (98 Granville Rd)
Fax: +852-27243896 (98 Granville Rd)
Phone: 2552 8286 (Tai Sang Aberdeen)
Fax: 2873 1575 (Tai Sang Aberdeen)

Peter Chan Pui - [also] Director (Blue Box (OEM)), Director (Blue Box Australia), until demise
Sykes Lau - Vice President of Sales (OEM business) at Blue Box (OEM) Ltd (from 2005-present), Senior Engineering Manager Tai Sang (2001-2005 - previously at Lok Tai On Toys Limited)
Ngai Kwan Ng - Director (Blue Box Holdings, 2016)
Wing Wo Sun  - Director (Blue Box Holdings, 2016)
Chi Kong Yeung  - Director (Blue Box Holdings, 2016)
Chan Kwok Bun - Director (Blue Box (OEM) and Blue Box holdings - current)
Hung Cheong Lau - Director Blue Box (OEM))

Trademark Filed: 29th November 1966
Trademark Granted: 31st August 1971
Trademark and Word Mark Renewed: 5th March 2011
Trademark: BLUE-BOX
Trademark Serial Number: 72259685 ('Blue cartouche' BLUE-BOX)
Trademark Registration Number: 0919291
Word Mark: Blue-Box

Trademark Serial Number: LMC174144 ('Red cartouche' RED-BOX)

'Candy Home' Registered in Canada: 27th November 1984

1957 - First use of "Blue-Box" as branding
1960 - Tai Sang Industrial Company Ltd., formally founded/registered

Tai Sang continuing as the wholesale arm for the distribution of games, toys, hobby goods, and supplies.

Customers of Blue Box (OEM) Ltd., (from 2005 onwards)
Leapfrog, Brio, Caben, Claessens Kid, Development Plus Inc., Early Learning Centre (ELC), Kolcraft, Laser Pegs, Mimi World, Vivid Imagination.

Customers of Tai Sang Ind. Co. Ltd., (early 2000's)
Evenflo, Gakken, Golden Bear, Hoberman, Pedigree, Vivid, Worlds Apart, etc....

Additions to listings

Dolls Furniture Series
Settee

722?? - Farm Set (small scale cottage with trellis and bench, plus 3 people, fences and +/- 20 animals)

81 - Teile Puppenhaus Mit Einrichtung (German marketed version of the Blue Box dolls house)

Links for Tauber and Canadian registrations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Will be new entry - Motormax / Redbox / Red Box / RBI / RBI Holdings Limited / RBI Toys Inc. / RBI Group

Red Box Toy Factory Ltd. - 7/F, Tower 1, South Seas Centre, 75 Mody Road, Tsimshatsui East, Kowloon, Hong Kong (HK Office & Showroom)

RBI Toys Inc. - 371 W. Tullock St., Rialto, CA 92376-7702, USA (US Office & Warehouse)

Tel :  (852) 2722 8000 (HK Office & Showroom)
Tel :  (909) 879-7888 (US Office)
Fax : (852) 2722 8998 (HK Office & Showroom)
Fax : (909) 879-7878 (US Office)
Email : hk@redboxtoy.com (HK Office & Showroom)
Email : sales@rbitoys.com (US Office)

They probably have an admin/liaison presence in the old Blue Box building in Aberdeen as well.

Trademark registered in US - 1966, first use in Canada (and elsewhere) by 1964, now expired in US.

The RBI group, a wholy-owned subsidiary of Tai Sang and slightly younger partner/sister to Blue Box is now - like its sibling - a fully vertically-integrated toy manufacturer; headquartered in Hong Kong, with production facilities in the Dongguan and Heyuan provinces of the mainland. A contract manufacturer engaged in OBM, ODM, and OEM.

As far as collectors are concerned they lack the high-street branded presence of their sister Blue Box, except with the die-cast niche; there found under the Motormax sub-brand, boasting over 500 moulds in various scales and model kits. They do however have infant ranges branded to Red Box

Redbox was legally founded in 1985 as an autonomous element of the larger Tai Sang group having been raised as a brand in around 1964, before being formally registered in the US in 1966 and Canada in 1971 where it seems to have been run as a subsidiery of Blue Box, a situation that also prevailed in Australia with the importer George Tauber working with Tai Sang's own Australian importer (Blue Box Austrailia Pty. Ltd. - of which Tauber was MD!)

Other joint ventures including dolls and Hasbro knock-off  'action figures'.

The Motormax sub-brand was formed in 1997 to take advantage of the hand-back of the colonies of Hong Kong and Macau to mainland China. Inheriting the old Zee/Zylmex mould-tools, they also seem to have taken-on the workload of Blue Box's Macau die-casting plant as part of a rationalisation as Tai Sang transferred and embedded it's production assets on the mainland - it's notable the Red Box factories (four plants in two complexes) and Blue Box's (three separate facilities) are based in different areas of China.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Will be new entry - Motormax - See; Redbox and Zee Toys

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Oh look! Redbox and Blue Box are err...the same company!

Will be new entry - Tauber, G - See: George Tauber Imports and Blue Box

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Will be new entry - George Tauber Imports

449 High Street, Prahran, Victoria 3181, Australia

Flourished - 1950's-1970's (possibly still in business as late as 1980)

Cable: Taubertoy
Tel: 51-5242

Agents for Blue Box (HK), Dee Bee (UK), Dee & Cee (US), Ganz and Reliable (Canada) Red Box, Tai Sang and Tony Law (CAC; all HK) Uneeda (US, dolls) and Thomas Salter Toys (UK) among others.

George Tauber - Owner/founder (also joint director (with Peter Chan Pui and Tony Law) of Blue Box Australia Pty., Ltd. - formed 1969)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
You can see that as we delve into levels of company information, history, and corporate identity that are far more detailed than I ever imagined most A-Z entries would ever carry (or require!), the connections between Tai Sang, Redbox and Blue Box only get ever stronger, while Erwin 'the Cock-wackin' Monkey-Lizard' Sell (happily supported by Paul 'the Jabbering Fuck' Stadinger) sticks to his entirely [made-up as he went along] fictitious 'Rivals since...' line!
===============================================================

So 2017's shaping-up to be an interesting year . . .

Is that a rocket in his "plastic small" or is Erwin just pleased to see me still Blogging? Ably protected by Dr. 'Did I tell you I'm a psychoanalyst'' Burk while his alta-ego 'Fritz' educates the masses on Treefrog via his clever-phone - like a smart-phone but as thick as pig-shit. Darran 'hat somewhat obscured' Hatley's following the bandwagon and the whole is being carried by Stad's immeasurably-better-than-my-Stuff!

Still gotta' thank them for the traffic . . . not!

03-01-2017 - Yes - I know some of the above information is now published in their part two, mostly as a result of the stuff published here and on the A-Z entry for Blue box in October last, but the four posts published here today  (so far - there's a non-PSTSM one still to come!) were all loaded before Christmas or between Christmas and the New Year.

As a lot of their part two is now contradictory to the stuff I've published today and as Erwin is clearly getting himself tied in knots trying to maintain the line they are not related while publishing tons of stuff proving the links, I guess my rebuttal to their Part 2 will be shorter, and you can expect it in a few days (maybe by then we will have their part 3 . . I look forward to it. However it means I may hold back on the planned 'contributions week' as I don't want other people being or getting unnecessarily associated with this shit.

I would also point out that with the publication of their part two they are (having bitched about my 12,000-odd) over 5,000 themselves, and have only dealt (badly) so far with one of the main points I raised!

R is for Really? I Mean; Fucking Really? Have They no Shame?

Being my rebuttal of Paul Stadinger (the Jabbering Fuck)'s post, co-starring a Cock-wackin' Monkey-lizard called Erwin Sell, dated 17th December 2015


Part 3 - The Best Bits - again!

I know, I know . . . but if I get it all out of my system in one day, we can have a News, Views tomorrow, to clear the decks for a return to what I do best;

Which is: Irascibly Blog mass-produced, plastic, toy shite, 'cos I never managed to get a degree in something more useful like palaeontology, volcanism or astrophysics! Now that is rocket-science!

Unlike judging the origins of a web page, that's not rocket-science, that's Basic Internet Knowledge - Part 1 - Lesson 2 - URL endings

The Link

It's labouring the point, but I want to drive this home while we wait for their 'equally devastating' Erwin Sell versus Hugh Walters - Blue Box - Part 2

On the 17th of December 2015, Erwin Sell (or his mentor Paul Stadinger?) posted a link on Stad's Stuff and stated it was (and as always I will quote him so there's no room for error)

"Here from Hong Kong official (ministry of Health and labor-Welfare ) official site update as till 2015."

It's not English - by any stretch of the imagination, but we'll let that ride for now; this is the link as provided, and it's double-'official' apparently;


Hoping you've followed it out of curiosity - not that you need to, or you may have followed it from the earlier post here, today - as you will notice it has a '.jp' URL. Yes, the Ministry of Health and Labour-welfare we have been sent to by the two fuckwitted-stooge fruitcake's is the Japanese Government Ministry of Health and Labour-welfare, not the Hong Kong Chinese one!

If you wish to read about the latest earthquake in Japan, or an official goodwill visit by some Dutch minister to her Japanese counterpart, click 'English' at the top and you'll find you're in the right place, if - however - you want to find evidence to back-up Mr Sell's claim that the Tai Sang subsidiaries Redbox and Blue Box were NOT related and were in fact rivals; and again - let's quote the genius in full . . .

"It has been BLUE BOX main competitor since from china market.
It has “”wrongly mentioned”” as same or part as Blue Box companies in PW magazine incorrect. They are two complete different companies …
"

. . . then you will by now have realised you are not in the right place at all! Oh, no, not even slightly the right place! Although; a little clue here - there's no 'right place' to prove that particular claim of the Cock-wackin' Monkey-lizard's as it's errr . . . not true.

No, what we get is a relatively short, eclectic list of companies based in Hong Kong, some of which are long gone, some of which are not toy manufacturers, but all of which - I assume - (don't tell Erwin - he hates it when I assume stuff) have a link to the Health Ministry (in Japan - when I labor something I really labor it!), probably in the manufacture of plastic (and/or other) medical equipment, parts and/or components and/or emergency supplies and/or something like that.

I further 'assume' the list being comprised of those companies - specifically from HK - that have [at some point in the past (in the case of Stromberger; some time in the past!)] received some form of clearance or permission from the ministry. For want of a better phrase; an 'approved companies' list.

My Japanese being what it is (non-existent), and my failure to locate the English version of the page meaning I can only guess at the nature of that clearance/permission granting, I will assume (again!) that it is related to medical grade plastic production and/or Quality Assurance ('QA') and/or import-export licenses and/or something like that?

It does not prove that Redbox and Blue Box are 'main competitors', just because they both appear on it with different mailing addresses! Indeed, all the various incarnations of Tai Sang, "BLUE-BOX", Blue Box, Redbox, and Red Box (among others) have at one point been found in the one building in Aberdeen, known locally as 'The Blue Box Building'.

Their first 'ace' seems to prove me right? It certainly doesn't prove what they state it does! Nor is it what they want it to be, being another Ministry altogether, from another country altogether, and about as 'official' in these matters as my big toe!

However I'll thank him for finding it, there are 10 or twelve addresses and five or six companies there which are new to me, so more grist to the mill!

Moving swiftly along and leaving behind this farcical failure of an attempt to prove me wrong: the grim-faced duo had another ace up their sleeve on the 17th December didn't they? Oh yes, indeedly and yeay-verily did they have another ace, and the ace that they had was looked upon and found to be good, yeay, even unto the ends of time would it be talked-about as the ace of aces . . .

The Tai Sang 1981 Toy Catalogue Cover!

Again let us allow Erwin (or Paul, the authorship is confusing at the end of their post, although from the spelling I'm 'assuming' it's Erwin) to enlighten us as to the nature of the 'ace' in his own words . . .

"Other photo show a 1981 HK Toy fare advertise where clearly show Blue Box And Red Box as two entities with separated address and name plus factories .In this case showing the RED BOX factory in Singapore and Blue Box from Hong Kong."

. . . note the CAPITAL Redbox - here it is again;
Image Credit - Vectis Auctions

Are you getting as sick of the sight of it as I am? It actually shows two factory buildings, both apparently designed by the same firm of architects (I nearly did get a degree in that!), but these cheap, concrete, 1960's industrial buildings were (as they still are) often manufactured from off-the-peg, pre-formed panels, so that might be a red-herring? Anyway - I digress - the caption under the one which looks like the Aberdeen, Hong Kong building - I've just mentioned above - states . . .

"Blue Box Factory Building - Hong Kong"

. . . while the caption under the one which looks like pictures of the Toa Payoh, Singapore building I found on-line while researching Blue Box states . . .

"Blue Box Factory Building - Singapore"

 . . . and it even has, written across it, in Perspex letters about 750mm high (I was a sign-fitter after the architecture thing, and before the Segway or Stretch-limo stuff!); Blue Box Toy Factory Pte., Ltd.

There is no Red Box factory shown in either photo-image on that catalogue (sorry: "1981 HK Toy fare advertise" he wants you to think he was at the toy fair maybe? He was seven!), nor are either stated as being the Red Box factory!

How did the fucktards even think to publish that, with the claims they attached to it? After stealing it from Vectis, and/or failing to acknowledge the source and then changing the description - Making it up as they go along!

The only other evidence presented by the cover is the contact details for 'an' office & showroom, which because it doesn't stipulate the handling of either of the logo'd brands to be found on the cover (Blue Box and Redbox) specifically: can be assumed (yes Erwin; fucking assumption again!) instead to have represented both!

It also highlights one of the systemic failings in the Cock-wackin's research habits; he thinks (assumes!) that the rest of us haven't got the same Google! He imagined (assumed!) - despite my highlighting the Vectis archive at him, in the 12-000-worder J'accuse in October - that somehow, no one would check the origin of the picture - an image which obviously hadn't originated with him or the Jabbering Fuck!

Their second 'ace' [also] seems to prove me right? It certainly doesn't prove what they states it does!

I'm not celebrating here, I'm taking the piss out of two fuckwitted dullards who can't get their shit together in order to beat me up, in a war THEY started. It is beyond parody, it is tragic. These two couldn't fight their way out of a damp paper sack with a fire-axe and a flamethrower.

And we have their Parts 2, 3 . . . ; god-knows how many, to come? I will, before the year is out, rip them both new arseholes, live on the Internet for 7.something-billion people to read, again and again and again in the weeks and months and decades to come - if they are not very careful.

And how careful can they be? Manufacturing 'evidence' which then fails to back-up their support for Erwin's 'make it up as he goes along' shit - as highlighted, by me, in the autumn just past? They haven't even started to try.

===============================================================

As you've been so patient today, here's a random picture of some toy soldiers from my collection, they may be of Spanish* manufacture, but I'm going to assume you'd have to ask a Cock-wackin' Monkey-lizard?

* I lied - they're Polish! Indeed, I may have lied twice as they could be civilians, not soldiers, conscripted by the local Count or Baron to presumably sacrifice themselves on some Teutonic shield-wall?

I will also assume from the pre-prepared body-armour that the middle guy is a professional soldier, but the other two? The guy in the mail shirt could be assumed to be a local levy or standing-militia type, while I'm assuming the other chap was probably beating corn a week before call-up!

We can further assume I lied again when I said 'a random...' - as here's another! No doubt this time; we can assume no civilians . . . err . . . except the policeman! And he's not Polish (you can assume Bergan/Beton) so shouldn't even have been in the Polish tub, but I assume we're all on a learning-curve, even - presumably - me, only I don't make up 'facts' to hide mine as I go along!