So to Canè
(Canine = 'dog') and their set; 1474
Pirates! I've wanted these for a while, and needed them on the card to get
the 'ship' (read blob of vac-form!), so when I saw one going cheap (They're not
that rare, but prices have risen a bit in recent years) I grabbed it with
ITLAPD in mind.
Annoyingly, the set only has five poses
which is a bit dim of them? Also - given the previous post - orange is worse
that yellow to photograph . . . against just about any other colour!
The vac-formed ship replaces a simpler
trench which the other sets in this line got, and is manufactured in the same
way as Atlantic's, - maybe the same
source - with the decoration screen printed onto the sheet before forming, so
it gets further distorted (having been distorted as a design trying to anticipate
the final shape), especially if it's slightly miss-registered!
The five new chaps, they are copies of the
old Fontanini sculpts, almost
certainly with permission and have a lot of the signature elements of sculptor
Elio Simonetti who worked for Canè while
at Fontanini.
We've seen the others before, the pale-blue
variation of 'peg-leg' is manufactured from a soft eraser-rubber like material,
and the 'Captain' above him is actually a musketeer; the foppish-chap on the
other end of the row would also make a good musketeer!
So when you read "–PIRATES is only set that had 5 poses ,been one a “woman”?(pose with
hands in heaps and not facial hair ) " you know
you've come to the font of all shite! Shite which was translated from the facts
in the book being plagiarised!! How many hands? How many heaps? Are they heaps
of shite? They're not facial hair! Hahahahahaha! Actually the musketeers only
have five poses too, but that makes for ten contemporary figures!
The ship! For imaginative play with younger
owners it has some value, but really it's a leery-painted, blobby, simplified
model of a wreak!
Yes; I took far too many photographs!
I also crewed it with the still-unknown,
but probably cereal premium, might be Quaker,
1:76th scale pirates and they look quite at home!
I - obviously - took them off the card; as
I say they aren't that rare, and as it was an earlier one with staples it was
very easy, but I then had to clean five or six decades of grime of the card,
which I did with a pre-prepared 'wipe', which can be seen on the right after it
had done its job!
Which gave me a half-decent card to scan.
Right - that all took longer than necessary;
I'd taken far too many photographs . . . I may not get all three remaining
posts out, but one can be held back as it was supposed to lead in to a
'mini-season' the next day on another subject altogether, which I definitely haven't
got time for at the moment, but there will be two quick posts before midnight,
once I've fixed a pizza!
No comments:
Post a Comment